
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 160W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 240mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅76.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌28% higher power demand at 160W vs 125W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 59 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 433 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 240 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 161 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 65 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 533 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 444 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 510 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 355 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 255 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 775 FPS |
| medium | 327 FPS | 639 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 558 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 329 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 255 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 78.5%. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 22,651+78% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 4352+209% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+339% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 2535 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 136+55% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 4.3 MB+207% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 32 MB+2033% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 24.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W-22% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-18% | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 141.6+40% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 42.6% less ($170 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 2.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-43% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4 | 56.8+3% |
| Codename | TU116 | AD106 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #207 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












