G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

Why buy it

✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 572.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
591.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

2023

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅35.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,710 less on MSRP ($289 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 572.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 69.5 vs 10.3 G3D/$ ($289 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023).
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
591.7% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$289 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.3 vs 69.5 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $289 MSRP).
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation better than Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB?

Yes. RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 2.9% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation instead of FSR 3 + AFMF and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is about 591.7% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $289 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $289 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	179 FPS	102 FPS
medium	159 FPS	87 FPS
high	145 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	48 FPS
1440p
low	145 FPS	81 FPS
medium	117 FPS	68 FPS
high	108 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	33 FPS
medium	73 FPS	30 FPS
high	60 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	20 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	479 FPS	268 FPS
medium	405 FPS	213 FPS
high	326 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	148 FPS
1440p
low	298 FPS	198 FPS
medium	246 FPS	151 FPS
high	206 FPS	123 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	100 FPS
4K
low	131 FPS	91 FPS
medium	112 FPS	72 FPS
high	91 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	48 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	867 FPS	465 FPS
medium	705 FPS	404 FPS
high	603 FPS	341 FPS
ultra	452 FPS	288 FPS
1440p
low	663 FPS	339 FPS
medium	532 FPS	295 FPS
high	452 FPS	256 FPS
ultra	339 FPS	208 FPS
4K
low	452 FPS	229 FPS
medium	362 FPS	192 FPS
high	301 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	226 FPS	113 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
1080p
low	703 FPS	166 FPS
medium	585 FPS	136 FPS
high	491 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	412 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	541 FPS	121 FPS
medium	451 FPS	102 FPS
high	367 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	308 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	322 FPS	73 FPS
medium	285 FPS	61 FPS
high	257 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	37 FPS

Open Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB Open RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 17 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,096 points. Launch price was $334.

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 720 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,669 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB scores 20,096 and the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation reaches 20,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Raw compute: 13.21 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2581 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) vs 192.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	20,096	20,669+3%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2560	6144+140%
Compute (TFLOPS)	13.21 TFLOPS	19.17 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	2581 MHz+65%	1560 MHz
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	192+20%
L1 Cache	0.5 MB	6 MB+1100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores	40	48+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB is on a newer tier with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 280 GB/s (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — a 37.1% advantage for the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	384 GB/s+37%	280 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation).

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Encoder	VCN 4.0	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB draws 250W versus the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 750W (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB	RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	600W-20%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	80.4	295.3+267%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB launched at $289 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation launched at $1999. The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB costs 85.5% less ($1710 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 69.5 (Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB) vs 10.3 (RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation) — the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12GB offers 574.8% better value.