
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅16.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Measures 105mm instead of 267mm, a 162mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 115W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ❌64.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌154.3% longer card at 267mm vs 105mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 4000 Ada Generation make more sense than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 370 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 316 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 250 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 213 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 182 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 826 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 679 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 612 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 538 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 628 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 510 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 451 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 391 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 405 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 323 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 205 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 200 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU scores 25,267 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 5.1%. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 160 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,267+5% | 24,046 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 5120 | 6144+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.82 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS+69% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1560 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 192+20% |
| L1 Cache | 5 MB | 6 MB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 48+20% |
| Tensor Cores | 160 | 192+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 20% advantage for the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s+20% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+20% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU draws 115W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 48.6% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 105mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80°C.
| Feature | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 70W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 105mm | 267mm |
| Height | 82mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 219.7 | 343.5+56% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












