G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 91.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
100.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 91.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.1 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 190W, a 120W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 190W vs 70W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌
100.1% HIGHER MSRP
$1,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 4.3% higher PassMark G3D performance and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is about 100.1% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.3% higher G3D Mark. Radeon PRO W7700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon PRO W7700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon PRO W7700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $999 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 Ada Generation earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	223 FPS	123 FPS
medium	205 FPS	115 FPS
high	179 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	163 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	201 FPS	102 FPS
medium	167 FPS	89 FPS
high	139 FPS	72 FPS
ultra	130 FPS	63 FPS
4K
low	136 FPS	56 FPS
medium	114 FPS	50 FPS
high	91 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	36 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W7700 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	561 FPS	495 FPS
medium	462 FPS	418 FPS
high	360 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	302 FPS	283 FPS
1440p
low	369 FPS	338 FPS
medium	305 FPS	279 FPS
high	248 FPS	227 FPS
ultra	210 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	168 FPS	165 FPS
medium	138 FPS	138 FPS
high	115 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	91 FPS	97 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W7700 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	911 FPS	549 FPS
medium	741 FPS	468 FPS
high	644 FPS	396 FPS
ultra	519 FPS	333 FPS
1440p
low	704 FPS	434 FPS
medium	567 FPS	367 FPS
high	481 FPS	315 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	260 FPS
4K
low	492 FPS	271 FPS
medium	395 FPS	225 FPS
high	329 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	149 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W7700 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low	785 FPS	401 FPS
medium	653 FPS	332 FPS
high	591 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	506 FPS	277 FPS
1440p
low	622 FPS	313 FPS
medium	517 FPS	261 FPS
high	463 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	389 FPS	214 FPS
4K
low	399 FPS	179 FPS
medium	346 FPS	156 FPS
high	318 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	123 FPS

Open Radeon PRO W7700 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7700 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 23,062 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7700 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2600 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) vs 192.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	23,062	24,046+4%
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	6144+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.95 TFLOPS+20%	26.73 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2600 MHz+67%	1560 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	192	192
L1 Cache	0.75 MB	6 MB+700%
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%
Ray Tracing Cores	48	48

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7700 comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	16 GB+700%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s+20%	360 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	48 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder	VCN 4.0	8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder	VCN 4.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7700 draws 190W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 92.3% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7700	RTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP	190W	70W-63%
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	80°C
Perf/Watt	121.4	343.5+183%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The Radeon PRO W7700 costs 50% less ($1000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W7700 offers 92.5% better value.