
GeForce RTX 3080
Popular choices:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3080
2020Why buy it
- ✅42.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 192).
- ✅400% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌186% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3080
2020RTX 4000 Ada Generation
2023Why buy it
- ✅42.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,300 less on MSRP ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 198.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.9 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅41.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (272 vs 192).
- ✅400% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (10 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 320W, a 250W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 320W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3080 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 10 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (192 vs 272), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌186% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$699 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 35.9 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3080 better than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX 4000 Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 3080?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 579 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 493 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 390 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 338 FPS | 283 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 386 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 257 FPS | 227 FPS |
| ultra | 219 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 869 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 706 FPS | 468 FPS |
| high | 617 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 539 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 686 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 555 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 475 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 408 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 386 FPS | 225 FPS |
| high | 325 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 270 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 588 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 490 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 455 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 524 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 472 FPS | 261 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 358 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 344 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 314 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 289 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 261 FPS | 123 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3080 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080
The GeForce RTX 3080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 8704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 320W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 68 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,071 points. Launch price was $699.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3080 scores 25,071 and the RTX 4000 Ada Generation reaches 24,046 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3080 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 8,704 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 29.77 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 68 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 272 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 25,071+4% | 24,046 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 8704+42% | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 29.77 TFLOPS+11% | 26.73 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+10% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 272+42% | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 8.5 MB+42% | 6 MB |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 68+42% | 48 |
| Tensor Cores | 272+42% | 192 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3080 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3080 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3080 comes with 10 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3080 offers 400% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 760 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 111.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3080. Bus width: 320-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 5 MB (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 10 GB+400% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 ECC |
| Memory Bandwidth | 760 GB/s+111% | 360 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 320-bit+100% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 5 MB | 48 MB+860% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | 8th Gen NVENC (3x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3080 draws 320W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 128.2% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 285mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 320W | 70W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 285mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 78.3 | 343.5+339% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3080 launched at $699 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3080 costs 65% less ($1300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.9 (GeForce RTX 3080) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3080 offers 199.2% better value. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3080 | RTX 4000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699-65% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.9+199% | 12.0 |
| Codename | GA102 | AD104 |
| Release | September 1 2020 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #41 | #47 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












