GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024Core: 1042 MHzBoost: 1470 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

2024

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,830 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 428.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 12.0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

2023

Why buy it

  • 58.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 1082.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($1,999 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
  • 66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 4000 Ada Generation averages 58.3% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 24,046 vs 10,749 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is a 2024 model from an older generation with DLSS Super Resolution. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 123.7% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is about 1082.8% more expensive on MSRP at $1,999 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and you are getting 58.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 123.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than RTX 4000 Ada Generation?
Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $169 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX 4000 Ada Generation. The trade-off is that RTX 4000 Ada Generation currently gives you 123.7% higher G3D Mark and 58.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3050 6GB still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low85 FPS123 FPS
medium72 FPS115 FPS
high60 FPS96 FPS
ultra40 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low74 FPS102 FPS
medium64 FPS89 FPS
high47 FPS72 FPS
ultra30 FPS63 FPS
4K
low27 FPS56 FPS
medium25 FPS50 FPS
high17 FPS39 FPS
ultra15 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low174 FPS495 FPS
medium149 FPS418 FPS
high118 FPS328 FPS
ultra87 FPS283 FPS
1440p
low129 FPS338 FPS
medium106 FPS279 FPS
high83 FPS227 FPS
ultra62 FPS190 FPS
4K
low74 FPS165 FPS
medium62 FPS138 FPS
high48 FPS120 FPS
ultra34 FPS97 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low484 FPS549 FPS
medium387 FPS468 FPS
high322 FPS396 FPS
ultra242 FPS333 FPS
1440p
low363 FPS434 FPS
medium290 FPS367 FPS
high242 FPS315 FPS
ultra181 FPS260 FPS
4K
low242 FPS271 FPS
medium193 FPS225 FPS
high161 FPS187 FPS
ultra121 FPS149 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
1080p
low243 FPS401 FPS
medium210 FPS332 FPS
high171 FPS301 FPS
ultra144 FPS277 FPS
1440p
low185 FPS313 FPS
medium166 FPS261 FPS
high131 FPS236 FPS
ultra109 FPS214 FPS
4K
low104 FPS179 FPS
medium87 FPS156 FPS
high69 FPS142 FPS
ultra55 FPS123 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.

NVIDIA

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,046 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB scores 10,749 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 24,046 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation leads by 123.7%. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 6,144 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 26.73 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1470 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 18 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) with 72 Tensor cores vs 192.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
10,749
24,046+124%
Architecture
Ampere
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2304
6144+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.774 TFLOPS
26.73 TFLOPS+295%
Boost Clock
1470 MHz
1560 MHz+6%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
72
192+167%
L1 Cache
2.3 MB
6 MB+161%
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB+2300%
Ray Tracing Cores
18
48+167%
Tensor Cores
72
192+167%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 360 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — a 114.3% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 96-bit vs 160-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+200%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6 ECC
Memory Bandwidth
168 GB/s
360 GB/s+114%
Bus Width
96-bit
160-bit+67%
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB+2300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 8th Gen NVENC (3x) (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC (7th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
Encoder
NVENC (5th Gen)
8th Gen NVENC (3x)
Decoder
NVDEC (7th Gen)
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only)
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB draws 70W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation's 70W — a 0% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 750W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: None vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
TDP
70W
70W
Recommended PSU
300W-60%
750W
Power Connector
None
1x 8-pin
Length
160mm
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
153.6
343.5+124%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169 MSRP, while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 91.5% less ($1830 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) vs 12.0 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 430% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3050 6GBRTX 4000 Ada Generation
MSRP
$169-92%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
63.6+430%
12.0
Codename
GA107
AD104
Release
February 2 2024
August 9 2023
Ranking
#252
#47