
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 115W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 150W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
2023RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 22.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 150W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 22.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,130 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile better than RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 422 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 295 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 326 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 179 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 885 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 722 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 634 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 550 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 696 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 564 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 483 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 413 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 474 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 385 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 329 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 267 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 467 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 410 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 303 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 387 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 245 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 188 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 163 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 2010 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24,805 points.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile scores 24,805 and the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU reaches 25,267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 7,424 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 24.72 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 2010 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 58 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 232 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 24,805 | 25,267+2% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 7424+45% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 24.72 TFLOPS+56% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2010 MHz+34% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 232+45% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 7.3 MB+46% | 5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 58+45% | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 232+45% | 160 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile draws 150W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 26.4% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 105mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 115W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 105mm |
| Height | 0mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 165.4 | 219.7+33% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












