
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 220W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅40.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌91.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅73.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 184).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 220W, a 105W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅40.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (184 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌91.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 271 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 231 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 200 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 743 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 614 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 485 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 388 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 202 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 140 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 116 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1380 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,157 points.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile scores 18,157 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 22.1%. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 7.066 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1380 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 320 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,157 | 22,172+22% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5888+130% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.066 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+187% |
| Boost Clock | 1380 MHz | 1725 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 184+15% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 5.8 MB+132% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 46+15% |
| Tensor Cores | 320+74% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 6th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: 4th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 6th Gen NVENC | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | 4th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 62.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-48% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 157.9+57% | 100.8 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












