
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅106.2% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1412.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅106.2% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,500 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1412.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌501% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 44.4 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 151.6%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 22,172+152% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2 | 5888+2% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 20.31 TFLOPS+302% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1725 MHz+97% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+30% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 5.8 MB+2422% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 650.4% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2 | 448 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.4+40% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 52.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 220W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 650W-7% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 100.8+329% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 83.4% less ($2500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 1431% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $499-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 44.4+1431% |
| Codename | GK110B | GA104 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #300 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













