
GeForce GTX 980
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌10% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅140.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 980
2014GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅140.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 120.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 20.2 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌10% HIGHER MSRP$549 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 980?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 399 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 332 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 249 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 299 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 242 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 71 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 53 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 980
GeForce GTX 980
The GeForce GTX 980 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,077 points. Launch price was $549.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 scores 11,077 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 100.2%. The GeForce GTX 980 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 4.981 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,077 | 22,172+100% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.981 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+308% |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | 1725 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 5.8 MB+673% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 980 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 980) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 448 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 draws 220W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 0% difference. The GeForce RTX 3070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 50.4 | 100.8+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 launched at $549 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 9.1% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.2 (GeForce GTX 980) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 119.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549 | $499-9% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.2 | 44.4+120% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA104 |
| Release | September 19 2014 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #245 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












