
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $359 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 211mm instead of 242mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅270.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌256.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌14.7% longer card at 242mm vs 211mm.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $359 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 220W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅Measures 211mm instead of 242mm, a 31mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅270.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌256.4% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌214.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 70W.
- ❌14.7% longer card at 242mm vs 211mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 249.2%. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 22,172+249% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 5888+667% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+850% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz | 1725 MHz+24% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 48 | 184+283% |
| L1 Cache | 0.28 MB | 5.8 MB+1971% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 448 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 103.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 211mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-68% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-54% | 650W |
| Power Connector | None | 8-pin |
| Length | 211mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 100.8+11% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 71.9% less ($359 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 2.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-72% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+2% | 44.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | GA104 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #381 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













