
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 220W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40.1% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+153.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌18.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 185W.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 185W instead of 220W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+153.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.4 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌40.1% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌18.9% higher power demand at 220W vs 185W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than GeForce RTX 3070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3070

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 153.4%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1725 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 46 (GeForce RTX 3070) with 288 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 22,172+153% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5888+156% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+167% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1725 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 184+28% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 5.8 MB+152% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 46+28% |
| Tensor Cores | 288+57% | 184 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 17.3% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-16% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 100.8+113% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3070 costs 28.6% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 offers 255.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $499-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 44.4+255% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #302 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













