
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+18.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅21.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 112).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,363 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌158.1% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅+18.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $520 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 205.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅4.2% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅21.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (136 vs 112).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 136), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (14,363 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌158.1% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 517 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 323 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 76 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 14,363 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 18.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1957 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 34 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) with 112 Tensor cores vs 136.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+18% | 14,363 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4352+21% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+34% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1957 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 136+21% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 4.3 MB+23% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 32 MB+967% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 34+21% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 136+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 32 MB+967% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 70W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 205.2+105% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 61.2% less ($520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 205.9% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-61% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+206% | 16.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | GB206 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #114 | #165 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












