
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌36.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
- ❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌36.8% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than RTX A2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX A2000

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX A2000's 13,464 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 26.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 112 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+26% | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+8% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+60% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+48% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+8% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+6% | 3.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+8% | 26 |
| Tensor Cores | 112+8% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 70W-59% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 192.3+92% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 26.9% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 72.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-27% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+73% | 29.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA106 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












