
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1134.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅66.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅407.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 112).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1966.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021RTX 6000 Ada Generation
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1134.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅66.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅407.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (568 vs 112).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 6000 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 568), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌1966.6% HIGHER MSRP$6,799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($6,799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 6000 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 578 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 438 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 607 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 325 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 921 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 389 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 340 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 246 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 102 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 28,454 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 67.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2505 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 142 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 568.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 28,454+67% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 18176+407% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 91.06 TFLOPS+615% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2505 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 112 | 568+407% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 17.8 MB+409% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 96 MB+3100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 142+407% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 568+407% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 960 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 96 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX 6000 Ada Generation's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+5% | 94.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 95.2% less ($6470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1131% better value. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | RTX 6000 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+1131% | 4.2 |
| Codename | GA106 | AD102 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | December 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #114 | #24 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












