G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌54.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 110W.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅26.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 170W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅26.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 110W instead of 170W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌54.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 110W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile better than GeForce RTX 3060?

Yes. RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 26.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 30.4% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 232 vs 112 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2021, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021, 30.4% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and you are getting 26.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 30.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce RTX 3060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $329 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	149 FPS	163 FPS
medium	131 FPS	150 FPS
high	118 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	115 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	138 FPS
medium	104 FPS	115 FPS
high	92 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	87 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	80 FPS
medium	58 FPS	68 FPS
high	39 FPS	52 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	46 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	354 FPS	422 FPS
medium	310 FPS	365 FPS
high	249 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	326 FPS
medium	196 FPS	272 FPS
high	160 FPS	222 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	186 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	179 FPS
medium	94 FPS	155 FPS
high	77 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	108 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	765 FPS	870 FPS
medium	612 FPS	712 FPS
high	510 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	499 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	691 FPS
medium	432 FPS	561 FPS
high	366 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	374 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	470 FPS
medium	298 FPS	383 FPS
high	221 FPS	328 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	249 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	523 FPS	459 FPS
medium	452 FPS	408 FPS
high	383 FPS	344 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	381 FPS
medium	371 FPS	340 FPS
high	298 FPS	284 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	244 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	242 FPS
medium	259 FPS	221 FPS
high	225 FPS	188 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 58 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,167 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 22,167 — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile leads by 30.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7,424 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 24.72 TFLOPS (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 58 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 112 Tensor cores vs 232.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	16,995	22,167+30%
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584	7424+107%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS	24.72 TFLOPS+94%
Boost Clock	1777 MHz+7%	1665 MHz
ROPs	48	80+67%
TMUs	112	232+107%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB	7.3 MB+109%
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%
Ray Tracing Cores	28	58+107%
Tensor Cores	112	232+107%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 20% advantage for the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 48 MB (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	12 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s	432 GB/s+20%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	48 MB+1500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile's 110W — a 42.9% difference. The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 150W (RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	170W	110W-35%
Recommended PSU	550W	150W-73%
Power Connector	8-pin	Mobile
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.0	201.5+101%