G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+11.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 238.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (112 vs 88).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,252 vs 16,995).
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 112), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌
203.6% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅+11.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 238.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (112 vs 88).

Why buy it

✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 170W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 242mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌142.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 70W.
❌44.9% longer card at 242mm vs 167mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,252 vs 16,995).
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 112), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌
203.6% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than RTX 2000E Ada Generation?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 16,995 vs 15,252 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 3060 is the overall package: you are getting DLSS Super Resolution.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 12 GB, and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about $670 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 11.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 238.3%. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 170W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX 2000E Ada Generation make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?

Yes. RTX 2000E Ada Generation is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (70W vs 170W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $999 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 currently gives you 11.4% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 238.3%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

RTX 2000E Ada Generation Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	149 FPS	199 FPS
medium	131 FPS	184 FPS
high	118 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	180 FPS
medium	104 FPS	155 FPS
high	92 FPS	130 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	113 FPS
medium	58 FPS	99 FPS
high	39 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	68 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	354 FPS	342 FPS
medium	310 FPS	285 FPS
high	249 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	212 FPS
medium	196 FPS	181 FPS
high	160 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	109 FPS
medium	94 FPS	90 FPS
high	77 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	765 FPS	686 FPS
medium	612 FPS	549 FPS
high	510 FPS	458 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	456 FPS
medium	432 FPS	385 FPS
high	366 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	335 FPS
medium	298 FPS	274 FPS
high	221 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	163 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
1080p
low	523 FPS	617 FPS
medium	452 FPS	538 FPS
high	383 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	343 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	507 FPS
medium	371 FPS	412 FPS
high	298 FPS	343 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	257 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	311 FPS
medium	259 FPS	275 FPS
high	225 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	172 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open RTX 2000E Ada Generation

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and RTX 2000E Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 15,252 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 11.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) with 112 Tensor cores vs 88.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	16,995+11%	15,252
Architecture	Ampere	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	8 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584+27%	2816
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+6%	12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz	2130 MHz+20%
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	112+27%	88
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+25%	2.8 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores	28+27%	22
Tensor Cores	112+27%	88

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 60.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	16 GB+33%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s+61%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 83.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
TDP	170W	70W-59%
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	167mm
Height	112mm	68mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	75°C
Perf/Watt	100.0	217.9+118%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 67.1% less ($670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 237.9% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).