G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅4.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌25.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 135W.

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Draws 135W instead of 170W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon RX 6700M

2021

Why buy it

✅4.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅20% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 10 GB).

Why buy it

✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅Draws 135W instead of 170W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌25.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 135W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 10 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR 3 (2023) instead.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon RX 6700M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 4.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 25.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 2 Super Resolution, and 12 GB vs 10 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6700M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with FSR 3 (2023) instead of DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of DLSS Super Resolution and a 7nm process instead of 8nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $329 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 4.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 25.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon RX 6700M is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about lower power draw (135W vs 170W) and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 6700M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?

Yes. Radeon RX 6700M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (135W vs 170W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 currently gives you 25.7% higher G3D Mark and 4.5% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6700M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	149 FPS	164 FPS
medium	131 FPS	146 FPS
high	118 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	138 FPS
medium	104 FPS	112 FPS
high	92 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	84 FPS
medium	58 FPS	70 FPS
high	39 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	48 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	354 FPS	392 FPS
medium	310 FPS	329 FPS
high	249 FPS	269 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	223 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	255 FPS
medium	196 FPS	213 FPS
high	160 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	144 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	120 FPS
medium	94 FPS	103 FPS
high	77 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	63 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	765 FPS	609 FPS
medium	612 FPS	487 FPS
high	510 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	456 FPS
medium	432 FPS	365 FPS
high	366 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	304 FPS
medium	298 FPS	243 FPS
high	221 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
1080p
low	523 FPS	609 FPS
medium	452 FPS	487 FPS
high	383 FPS	406 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	304 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	456 FPS
medium	371 FPS	365 FPS
high	298 FPS	304 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	228 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	291 FPS
medium	259 FPS	243 FPS
high	225 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	152 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon RX 6700M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 6700M

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon RX 6700M

The Radeon RX 6700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1489 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 135W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,525 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 13,525 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 25.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 6700M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11.06 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 36 (Radeon RX 6700M) with 112 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
G3D Mark Score	16,995+26%	13,525
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584+56%	2304
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+15%	11.06 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz	2400 MHz+35%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	112	144+29%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+600%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28	36+29%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 6700M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700M has 10 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700M) — a 12.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 160-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+20%	10 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	360 GB/s+13%	320 GB/s
Bus Width	192-bit+20%	160-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6700M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6700M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6700M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon RX 6700M
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon RX 6700M's 135W — a 23% difference. The Radeon RX 6700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6700M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.