
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 280
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅147.8% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 160.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅147.8% more average FPS across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 160.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 19.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 26 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 19.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon R9 280?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 280 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 199 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon R9 280

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon R9 280
Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon R9 280's 5,532 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 207.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+207% | 5,532 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+281% | 3.344 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+90% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+695% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 280 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+300% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s+50% | 240 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-15% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+261% | 27.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 280 launched at $279. The Radeon R9 280 costs 15.2% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 19.8 (Radeon R9 280) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 161.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $279-15% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+161% | 19.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #114 | #415 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












