G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+101.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 40.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon PRO W6400

2022

Why buy it

✅+101.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 40.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
❌44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,428 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon PRO W6400?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 8,428 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon PRO W6400 is a 2022 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 101.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about 43.7% more expensive on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and you are getting 101.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 40.4%. Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (50W vs 170W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon PRO W6400 make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W6400 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (50W vs 170W), and staying closer to $229 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 3060. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 3060 currently gives you 101.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 40.4%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6400 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	149 FPS	107 FPS
medium	131 FPS	95 FPS
high	118 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	67 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	95 FPS
medium	104 FPS	80 FPS
high	92 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	56 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	45 FPS
medium	58 FPS	42 FPS
high	39 FPS	31 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	28 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	354 FPS	165 FPS
medium	310 FPS	130 FPS
high	249 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	63 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	108 FPS
medium	196 FPS	85 FPS
high	160 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	56 FPS
medium	94 FPS	44 FPS
high	77 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	22 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	765 FPS	333 FPS
medium	612 FPS	292 FPS
high	510 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	173 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	235 FPS
medium	432 FPS	211 FPS
high	366 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	123 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	137 FPS
medium	298 FPS	124 FPS
high	221 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	56 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
1080p
low	523 FPS	285 FPS
medium	452 FPS	206 FPS
high	383 FPS	180 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	146 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	210 FPS
medium	371 FPS	149 FPS
high	298 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	104 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	105 FPS
medium	259 FPS	76 FPS
high	225 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	51 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon PRO W6400

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon PRO W6400

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W6400

The Radeon PRO W6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2331 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,428 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 8,428 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 101.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6400). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.58 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6400). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2331 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6400) with 112 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
G3D Mark Score	16,995+102%	8,428
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3584+367%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+256%	3.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1777 MHz	2331 MHz+31%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	112+133%	48
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+1300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	28+133%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6400 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6400 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6400). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6400).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon PRO W6400's 50W — a 109.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6400). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon PRO W6400
TDP	170W	50W-71%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	168mm
Height	112mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75	70°C-7%
Perf/Watt	100.0	168.6+69%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6400 launched at $229. The Radeon PRO W6400 costs 30.4% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 36.8 (Radeon PRO W6400) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 40.5% better value. The Radeon PRO W6400 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).