
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅69.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 311.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌82.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅69.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 311.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌82.4% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 85 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro 580X

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 7,540 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 125.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+125% | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+130% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+48% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+525% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580X has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 580X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 150W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+99% | 50.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 45.2% less ($271 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 310.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+310% | 12.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #114 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












