
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌811.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅70.3% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1658.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2014GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅70.3% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $2,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1658.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌811.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GeForce GTX TITAN Z?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX TITAN Z still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 34 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 396 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 317 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 264 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 198 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 297 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 198 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 188 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX TITAN Z and GeForce RTX 3060

GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 28 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 705 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 5760 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,811 points. Launch price was $2,999.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 8,811 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 92.9%. The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 5,760 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,811 | 16,995+93% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 5760 ×2+61% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS ×2 | 12.74 TFLOPS+152% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1777 MHz+103% |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 48 |
| TMUs | 240 ×2+114% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 0.23 MB | 3.5 MB+1422% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX TITAN Z is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 833.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX TITAN Z. Bus width: 384-bit x2 vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s x2 | 360 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit x2+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z draws 375W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 75.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 700W (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 3 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 375W | 170W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 700W | 550W-21% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 3 | 2-33% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 23.5 | 100.0+326% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX TITAN Z launched at $2999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 89% less ($2670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.9 (GeForce GTX TITAN Z) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1682.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX TITAN Z | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $329-89% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.9 | 51.7+1683% |
| Codename | GK110B | GA106 |
| Release | May 28 2014 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #300 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













