
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌112.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+94.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 312.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+94.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $370 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 312.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌112.5% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is CMP 40HX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3060

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 94.3%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 288 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 16,995+94% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+68% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1777 MHz+8% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 3.5 MB+52% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+29% | 28 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+157% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (CMP 40HX) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the CMP 40HX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 12 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: No vs NVDEC 5th Gen.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 8.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W | 170W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 100.0+111% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 52.9% less ($370 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 313.6% better value.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $329-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 51.7+314% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA106 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #302 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













