
Arc A730M
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Arc A730M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 170W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 80W.
Arc A730M
2022GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 170W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅9.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 170W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Arc A730M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Arc A730M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 294 FPS | 354 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 213 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 201 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 117 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 441 FPS | 765 FPS |
| medium | 353 FPS | 612 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 382 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 256 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 383 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 186 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A730M and GeForce RTX 3060

Arc A730M
Arc A730M
The Arc A730M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,808 points.

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Arc A730M scores 9,808 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 73.3%. The Arc A730M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Arc A730M) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 12.6 TFLOPS (Arc A730M) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1777 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (Arc A730M) vs 28 (GeForce RTX 3060) with 384 Tensor cores vs 112.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,808 | 16,995+73% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3584+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.6 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz+15% | 1777 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.5 MB+29% | 3.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 28+17% |
| Tensor Cores | 384+243% | 112 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Arc A730M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 12 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (Arc A730M) vs 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) — a 7.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 12 MB (Arc A730M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the Arc A730M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 360 GB/s+7% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB+300% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A730M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A730M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A730M) vs AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A730M draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 72% difference. The Arc A730M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A730M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-53% | 170W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-9% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 122.6+23% | 100.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A730M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Arc A730M | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $329 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | GA106 |
| Release | 2022 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #264 | #114 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













