
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+139.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅21.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,485 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+139.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅21.1% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (184 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 200W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 184), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 200W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,485 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A4500 Embedded GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4500 Embedded GPU make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 46 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 382 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 255 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 95 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A4500 Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
RTX A4500 Embedded GPU
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 30 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 510 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,485 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 8,485 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 139.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 14.31 TFLOPS (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1215 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 46 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU) with 152 Tensor cores vs 184.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+139% | 8,485 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 5888+21% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+13% | 14.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+37% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 184+21% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 5.8 MB+21% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 46+21% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 184+21% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 8.0 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP11. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 8.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP11 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A4500 Embedded GPU's 80W — a 85.7% difference. The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A4500 Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 80W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 106.1+4% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4500 Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4500 Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 30 2022 |
| Ranking | #73 | #307 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












