
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 140W.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 200W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅+71.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 330.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (192 vs 152).
- ✅Draws 140W instead of 200W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 192), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 140W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,815 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌150.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than RTX A4000H?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A4000H make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 226 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 532 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 425 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 266 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 319 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 133 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 306 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX A4000H

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A4000H
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX A4000H's 11,815 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 71.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) with 152 Tensor cores vs 192.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+72% | 11,815 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 6144+26% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+7% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 192+26% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 6 MB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 48+26% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 192+26% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000H supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | None |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX A4000H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 140W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+20% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 331.4% better value. The RTX A4000H is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-60% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+331% | 11.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












