
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+24.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅5.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 152).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅4.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅+24.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅5.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (160 vs 152).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 200W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,312 vs 25,267).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 160), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌73.9% higher power demand at 200W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 370 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 213 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 679 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 612 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 451 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 391 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 209 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,267 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 25,267 — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU leads by 24.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5,120 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 15.82 TFLOPS (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1500 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 40 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) with 152 Tensor cores vs 160.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 25,267+24% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 5120+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+2% | 15.82 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+11% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 160+5% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 5 MB+4% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 40+5% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 160+5% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has 12 GB. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 432 GB/s (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — a 3.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU) — the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+4% | 432 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU's 115W — a 54% difference. The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 105mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 115W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 105mm |
| Height | 112mm | 82mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 219.7+116% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | RTX 3500 Ada Generation Embedded GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | AD104 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #73 | #81 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












