G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+210.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,548 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon RX Vega M GH

2018

Why buy it

✅+210.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 200W, a 100W reduction.
✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 200W vs 100W.
❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,548 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega M GH?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 6,548 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon RX Vega M GH is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018, 210.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of Unknown, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 210.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon RX Vega M GH still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega M GH is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega M GH Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	152 FPS	106 FPS
medium	137 FPS	91 FPS
high	118 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	45 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	92 FPS
medium	107 FPS	81 FPS
high	91 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	35 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	29 FPS
medium	65 FPS	27 FPS
high	50 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	425 FPS	213 FPS
medium	366 FPS	178 FPS
high	296 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	154 FPS
medium	229 FPS	127 FPS
high	190 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	80 FPS
medium	114 FPS	66 FPS
high	96 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	859 FPS	295 FPS
medium	693 FPS	236 FPS
high	602 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	147 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	221 FPS
medium	529 FPS	177 FPS
high	452 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	110 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	147 FPS
medium	346 FPS	118 FPS
high	275 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	74 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
1080p
low	580 FPS	173 FPS
medium	514 FPS	144 FPS
high	424 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	104 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	122 FPS
medium	427 FPS	103 FPS
high	335 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	72 FPS
medium	266 FPS	58 FPS
high	234 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon RX Vega M GH

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega M GH

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega M GH

The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 6,548 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 210.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1190 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
G3D Mark Score	20,312+210%	6,548
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	4864+217%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+343%	3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+40%	1190 MHz
ROPs	80+25%	64
TMUs	152+58%	96
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+1163%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega M GH relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 204.8 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — a 118.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+119%	204.8 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit	1024-bit+300%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCE 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon RX Vega M GH
TDP	200W	100W-50%
Recommended PSU	600W	1W-100%
Power Connector	8-pin	Integrated
Length	242mm	1mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+55%	65.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($399 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).