
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 28.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 64

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 13,949 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 45.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+46% | 13,949 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+19% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+28% | 12.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+8% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 256+68% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+380% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 64 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) — a 8% advantage for the Radeon RX Vega 64. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 484 GB/s+8% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 38.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-32% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+115% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 81.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-20% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+82% | 28.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












