
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 56
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+55.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 55.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 280mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,026 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌15.7% longer card at 280mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX Vega 56
2017Why buy it
- ✅+55.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 55.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 32.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 280mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,026 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 32.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌15.7% longer card at 280mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX Vega 56?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 56 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 586 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 469 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 440 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 352 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX Vega 56

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 14 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1156 MHz to 1471 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 210W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,026 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 13,026 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 55.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega 56 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,584 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.54 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 56). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1471 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+56% | 13,026 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+36% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+54% | 10.54 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+13% | 1471 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 224+47% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+445% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX Vega 56 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 410 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 56) — a 9.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+9% | 410 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 2048-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 56). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 56). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 56).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX Vega 56's 210W — a 4.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Radeon RX Vega 56). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 280mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-5% | 210W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 280mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+64% | 62.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 56 launched at $399. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 32.6 (Radeon RX Vega 56) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 56.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+56% | 32.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 14 2017 |
| Ranking | #73 | #199 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












