
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+129.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
- ❌34.4% longer card at 242mm vs 180mm.
Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 180mm instead of 242mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,837 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon RX 5500
2019Why buy it
- ✅+129.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 110W instead of 200W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Measures 180mm instead of 242mm, a 62mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 110W.
- ❌34.4% longer card at 242mm vs 180mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,837 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon RX 5500?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX 5500 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 304 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 74 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 34 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 5500

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon RX 5500
Radeon RX 5500
The Radeon RX 5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,837 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon RX 5500's 8,837 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 129.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX 5500 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+130% | 8,837 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+245% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+212% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1845 MHz+11% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+73% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5500 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon RX 5500's 110W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 110W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 180mm |
| Height | 112mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+27% | 80.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5500 launched at $179. The Radeon RX 5500 costs 55.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 49.4 (Radeon RX 5500) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon RX 5500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $179-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+3% | 49.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #73 | #297 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












