
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+163.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,701 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro WX 7100
2016Why buy it
- ✅+163.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 200W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.8% higher power demand at 200W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,701 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro WX 7100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro WX 7100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 347 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 87 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro WX 7100

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1188 MHz to 1243 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,701 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 7,701 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 163.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.728 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1243 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+164% | 7,701 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+111% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+183% | 5.728 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+34% | 1243 MHz |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+6% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+757% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 7100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro WX 7100's 130W — a 42.4% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 7100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 130W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+72% | 59.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 7100 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 9.6 (Radeon Pro WX 7100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 430.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+430% | 9.6 |
| Codename | GA104 | Ellesmere |
| Release | December 1 2020 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #73 | #331 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












