
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅52.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Trade-offs
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 200W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅52.8% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 200W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌122.2% higher power demand at 200W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon PRO W6600M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 186 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 60 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 11,407 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 78.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+78% | 11,407 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+171% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+122% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2034 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+860% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+36% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 75.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 90W-55% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 126.7+25% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600M is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #73 | #240 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












