
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅18.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 628.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌375.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅18.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1,500 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 628.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌375.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro VII?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro VII still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 69 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 149 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro VII

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro VII's 13,264 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 53.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+53% | 13,264 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+27% | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+24% | 13.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1700 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 80+25% | 64 |
| TMUs | 152 | 240+58% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+411% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro VII's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon Pro VII). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 305mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+91% | 53.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 79% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 627.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-79% | $1899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+627% | 7.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












