
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅187.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅187.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 28.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 200W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌60% higher power demand at 200W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.7 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5500 XT still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 7,910 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 156.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+157% | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+217% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+200% | 5.398 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1757 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+58% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 125W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+61% | 63.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 50.1% less ($200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 28.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $199-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+28% | 39.7 |
| Codename | GA104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #73 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












