G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+247% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,853 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅+247% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 200W, a 115W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌135.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 85W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,853 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon Pro 5300M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 5,853 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro 5300M is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2019, 247.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 247.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon Pro 5300M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro 5300M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	152 FPS	98 FPS
medium	137 FPS	85 FPS
high	118 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	88 FPS
medium	107 FPS	76 FPS
high	91 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	28 FPS
medium	65 FPS	27 FPS
high	50 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	425 FPS	125 FPS
medium	366 FPS	87 FPS
high	296 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	82 FPS
medium	229 FPS	49 FPS
high	190 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	38 FPS
medium	114 FPS	25 FPS
high	96 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	859 FPS	263 FPS
medium	693 FPS	211 FPS
high	602 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	198 FPS
medium	529 FPS	158 FPS
high	452 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	132 FPS
medium	346 FPS	105 FPS
high	275 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	580 FPS	141 FPS
medium	514 FPS	113 FPS
high	424 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	80 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	103 FPS
medium	427 FPS	85 FPS
high	335 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	59 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	59 FPS
medium	266 FPS	47 FPS
high	234 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 247%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	20,312+247%	5,853
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4864+280%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+406%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+33%	1250 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32
TMUs	152+90%	80
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder	NVENC (Ampere)	VCN 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC (Ampere)	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 80.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon Pro 5300M
TDP	200W	85W-57%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+47%	68.9