GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon HD 8990

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+289.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon HD 8990

2013

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,214 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Radeon HD 8990

2013

Why buy it

✅+289.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 875.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,214 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
150.4% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon HD 8990?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 5,214 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon HD 8990 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2013, 289.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 3 GB, and the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about $600 cheaper on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 289.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 875.4%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon HD 8990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon HD 8990 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Radeon HD 8990 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
1080p
low	152 FPS	100 FPS
medium	137 FPS	82 FPS
high	118 FPS	64 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	83 FPS
medium	107 FPS	70 FPS
high	91 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	82 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	27 FPS
medium	65 FPS	26 FPS
high	50 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon HD 8990

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
1080p
low	425 FPS	143 FPS
medium	366 FPS	118 FPS
high	296 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	71 FPS
1440p
low	272 FPS	88 FPS
medium	229 FPS	66 FPS
high	190 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	156 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	133 FPS	37 FPS
medium	114 FPS	28 FPS
high	96 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon HD 8990

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
1080p
low	859 FPS	235 FPS
medium	693 FPS	188 FPS
high	602 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	457 FPS	117 FPS
1440p
low	658 FPS	176 FPS
medium	529 FPS	141 FPS
high	452 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	343 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	434 FPS	117 FPS
medium	346 FPS	94 FPS
high	275 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon HD 8990

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
1080p
low	580 FPS	145 FPS
medium	514 FPS	116 FPS
high	424 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	373 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	478 FPS	107 FPS
medium	427 FPS	87 FPS
high	335 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	290 FPS	58 FPS
4K
low	285 FPS	63 FPS
medium	266 FPS	48 FPS
high	234 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Open Radeon HD 8990

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon HD 8990

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon HD 8990

The Radeon HD 8990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,214 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon HD 8990's 5,214 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 289.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon HD 8990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 8990). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 8990). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
G3D Mark Score	20,312+290%	5,214
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	4864+138%	2048 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.2 TFLOPS+296%	4.096 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	1665 MHz+67%	1000 MHz
ROPs	80+150%	32 ×2
TMUs	152+19%	128 ×2
L1 Cache	4.8 MB+860%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+433%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 8990 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8990 has 3 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8990) — a 543.3% advantage for the Radeon HD 8990. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 8990) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+167%	3 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+56%	288 GB/s x2
Bus Width	256-bit	384-bit x2+50%
L2 Cache	4 MB+433%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 8990's 375W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (Radeon HD 8990). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti	Radeon HD 8990
TDP	200W-47%	375W
Recommended PSU	600W-20%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	242mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	101.6+631%	13.9

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 8990 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 60.1% less ($600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8990) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 878.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).