
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅230.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅230.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 200W, a 185W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1233.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Radeon 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon 780M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Radeon 780M's 6,906 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 194.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Radeon 780M) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+194% | 6,906 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+533% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+82% | 8.909 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2900 MHz+74% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+217% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+1820% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+217% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 172.1% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 460.4+353% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | Phoenix |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #73 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












