
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+13.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,901 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1693% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅23.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅278.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 152).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,887 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1478.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro RTX 6000
2018Why buy it
- ✅+13.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $5,901 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1693% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅23.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅278.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 152).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (152 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (17,887 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌1478.9% HIGHER MSRP$6,300 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($6,300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro RTX 6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 289 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 326 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 90 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 537 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 604 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 201 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 673 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 605 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 483 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 201 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro RTX 6000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000
The Quadro RTX 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,887 points. Launch price was $6,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 17,887 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 13.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 6000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 6000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 6000) with 152 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+14% | 17,887 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+6% | 4608 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 1770 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 288+89% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+7% | 4.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 72+89% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 576+279% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 6000 has 24 GB. The Quadro RTX 6000 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX 6000) — a 71.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX 6000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 6000) — the Quadro RTX 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 768 GB/s+71% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP10. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP10 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro RTX 6000's 260W — a 26.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 650W (Quadro RTX 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-23% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+48% | 68.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX 6000 launched at $6300. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 93.7% less ($5901 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.8 (Quadro RTX 6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1717.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro RTX 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-94% | $6300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+1718% | 2.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | TU102 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #73 | #99 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












