
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+72.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2062.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1152.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro M6000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+72.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,600 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2062.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 20,312).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1152.9% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro M6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 397 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 265 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 199 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 132 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 72.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+73% | 11,769 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+58% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+137% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+49% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 192+26% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+336% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 41.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+41% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-20% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+116% | 47.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 92% less ($4600 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 2020.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-92% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+2021% | 2.4 |
| Codename | GA104 | GM200 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | March 21 2015 |
| Ranking | #73 | #228 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












