
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2499.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1654.4% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅16.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $6,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2499.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1654.4% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Quadro GP100?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro GP100 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 61 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 146 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Quadro GP100

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Quadro GP100's 13,710 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 48.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+48% | 13,710 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+36% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+57% | 10.34 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz+15% | 1442 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 224+47% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB+269% | 1.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 128.6% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+129% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 16.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-15% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6+74% | 58.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 94.3% less ($6601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 2445% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-94% | $7000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+2445% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GA104 | GP100 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #73 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












