
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+246.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅+246.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A30M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Intel Arc Pro A30M

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 246.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 152 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312+247% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864+375% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS+296% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2000 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 80+150% | 32 |
| TMUs | 152+138% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38+375% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 120% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 117.2+15% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GA104 | DG2-128 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #73 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












