
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 310mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅40.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
- ❌28.1% longer card at 310mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 39.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 200W instead of 285W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 310mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅40.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌100.3% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 39.8 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌42.5% higher power demand at 285W vs 200W.
- ❌28.1% longer card at 310mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER better than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 282 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 82 FPS | 148 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 366 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 383 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 156 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 96 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 163 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 859 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 602 FPS | 955 FPS |
| ultra | 457 FPS | 716 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 658 FPS | 976 FPS |
| medium | 529 FPS | 859 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 716 FPS |
| ultra | 343 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 346 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 275 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 358 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 580 FPS | 962 FPS |
| medium | 514 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 424 FPS | 726 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 651 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 478 FPS | 753 FPS |
| medium | 427 FPS | 630 FPS |
| high | 335 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 290 FPS | 483 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 266 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 341 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 20,312 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 31,828 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER leads by 56.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 1665 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 38 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 152 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 20,312 | 31,828+57% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4864 | 8448+74% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.2 TFLOPS | 44.1 TFLOPS+172% |
| Boost Clock | 1665 MHz | 2610 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 152 | 264+74% |
| L1 Cache | 4.8 MB | 8.3 MB+73% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 38 | 66+74% |
| Tensor Cores | 152 | 264+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 672 GB/s+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 48 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (Ampere) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Ampere) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Ampere) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti draws 200W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 35.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 242mm vs 310mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W-30% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-20% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 242mm | 310mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 72°C-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 101.6 | 111.7+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 50.1% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) vs 39.8 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 27.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-50% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 50.9+28% | 39.8 |
| Codename | GA104 | AD103 |
| Release | December 1 2020 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #73 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












