GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,599 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+681.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 211.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 950A

2015

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 200W, a 125W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+681.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 211.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,599 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌166.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 950A?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 2,599 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 950A is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015, 681.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is about 150.9% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $159 MSRP, and you are getting 681.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 950A really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 950A still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 950A is 2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 2,599 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950A Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	29 FPS	152 FPS
medium	17 FPS	137 FPS
high	10 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	13 FPS	131 FPS
medium	7 FPS	107 FPS
high	3 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	2 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	5 FPS	77 FPS
medium	3 FPS	65 FPS
high	1 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	1 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950A Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	117 FPS	425 FPS
medium	88 FPS	366 FPS
high	62 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	85 FPS	272 FPS
medium	55 FPS	229 FPS
high	40 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	133 FPS
medium	30 FPS	114 FPS
high	22 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	73 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950A Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	117 FPS	859 FPS
medium	94 FPS	693 FPS
high	78 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	658 FPS
medium	70 FPS	529 FPS
high	58 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	434 FPS
medium	47 FPS	346 FPS
high	39 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	221 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950A Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	117 FPS	580 FPS
medium	94 FPS	514 FPS
high	78 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	58 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	88 FPS	478 FPS
medium	70 FPS	427 FPS
high	58 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	285 FPS
medium	47 FPS	266 FPS
high	39 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	29 FPS	195 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950A Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950A and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 950A scores 2,599 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 681.5%. The GeForce GTX 950A is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	2,599	20,312+682%
Architecture	Maxwell	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	640	4864+660%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.439 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS+1026%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz	1665 MHz+48%
ROPs	16	80+400%
TMUs	40	152+280%
L1 Cache	0.31 MB	4.8 MB+1448%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 950A is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950A comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 32 GB/s (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 1300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	8 GB+300%
Memory Type	DDR3	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	32 GB/s	448 GB/s+1300%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950A draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 90.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 950A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950A	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	75W-63%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	—	242mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	34.7	101.6+193%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 60.2% less ($240 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (GeForce GTX 950A) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 212.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).