
GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅232.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 352.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 680
2012GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅232.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 352.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25.1% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 680?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 680 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 64 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 126 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 189 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 126 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 262.1%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 20,312+262% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4864+217% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+398% |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 1665 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 128 | 152+19% |
| L1 Cache | 0.13 MB | 4.8 MB+3592% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 680 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 133.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 2.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 256mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W-3% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 256mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | 75-23% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8 | 101.6+253% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 20% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 354.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $399-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2 | 50.9+354% |
| Codename | GK104 | GA104 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #410 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













