G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,309 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅+222% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

2020

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 200W, a 150W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+222% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,309 vs 20,312).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 50.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌300% higher power demand at 200W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 20,312 vs 6,309 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a 2020 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is a 2020 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 222.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 8nm process instead of 12nm. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 222.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	102 FPS	152 FPS
medium	87 FPS	137 FPS
high	72 FPS	118 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	89 FPS	131 FPS
medium	76 FPS	107 FPS
high	56 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	77 FPS
medium	27 FPS	65 FPS
high	18 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	43 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	140 FPS	425 FPS
medium	118 FPS	366 FPS
high	97 FPS	296 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	248 FPS
1440p
low	85 FPS	272 FPS
medium	66 FPS	229 FPS
high	50 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	156 FPS
4K
low	37 FPS	133 FPS
medium	28 FPS	114 FPS
high	21 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	73 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	284 FPS	859 FPS
medium	227 FPS	693 FPS
high	189 FPS	602 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	457 FPS
1440p
low	213 FPS	658 FPS
medium	170 FPS	529 FPS
high	142 FPS	452 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	343 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	434 FPS
medium	114 FPS	346 FPS
high	95 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	221 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
1080p
low	169 FPS	580 FPS
medium	141 FPS	514 FPS
high	124 FPS	424 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	119 FPS	478 FPS
medium	99 FPS	427 FPS
high	86 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	290 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	285 FPS
medium	56 FPS	266 FPS
high	46 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	195 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Open GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design scores 6,309 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 222%. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score	6,309	20,312+222%
Architecture	Turing	Ampere
Process Node	12 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1024	4864+375%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.458 TFLOPS	16.2 TFLOPS+559%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz	1665 MHz+39%
ROPs	32	80+150%
TMUs	64	152+138%
L1 Cache	1 MB	4.8 MB+380%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	112 GB/s	448 GB/s+300%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (4th Gen) vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Encoder	NVENC (Turing)	NVENC (Ampere)
Decoder	NVDEC (4th Gen)	NVDEC (Ampere)
Codecs	H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9,H.265 10-bit	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design	GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP	50W-75%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W-42%	600W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	—	242mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75
Perf/Watt	126.2+24%	101.6