
CMP 40HX
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
CMP 40HX
2021Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅+132.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 306.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
CMP 40HX
2021GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+132.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 306.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 12.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,749 vs 20,312).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌75.2% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than CMP 40HX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does CMP 40HX make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 313 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 141 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 394 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 315 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 262 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 295 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 341 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 183 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of CMP 40HX and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

CMP 40HX
CMP 40HX
The CMP 40HX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 25 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1470 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 185W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,749 points. Launch price was $699.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the CMP 40HX scores 8,749 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 132.2%. The CMP 40HX is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (CMP 40HX) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 7.603 TFLOPS (CMP 40HX) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1650 MHz vs 1665 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (CMP 40HX) vs 38 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) with 288 Tensor cores vs 152.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,749 | 20,312+132% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4864+111% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.603 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+113% |
| Boost Clock | 1650 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 152+6% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 4.8 MB+109% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 38+6% |
| Tensor Cores | 288+89% | 152 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The CMP 40HX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The CMP 40HX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (CMP 40HX) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (CMP 40HX) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: No vs NVDEC (Ampere).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | No | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The CMP 40HX draws 185W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 7.8% difference. The CMP 40HX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (CMP 40HX) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 185W-8% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 101.6+115% |
Value Analysis
The CMP 40HX launched at $699 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti costs 42.9% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 12.5 (CMP 40HX) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 307.2% better value. The CMP 40HX is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | CMP 40HX | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $699 | $399-43% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 50.9+307% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA104 |
| Release | February 25 2021 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #302 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













