
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅220% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 80).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅55.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
2021GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅220% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (256 vs 80).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅55.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 256), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 153 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 75 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 347 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 232 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 174 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 17 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1185 MHz to 1477 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,717 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile scores 7,717 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 54.1%. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is built on Ampere while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 6.05 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1477 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) with 256 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,717 | 11,892+54% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.05 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+49% |
| Boost Clock | 1477 MHz | 1755 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+60% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 256+220% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 112 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 224 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8.0 (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP11 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP11 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 235mm |
| Height | 0mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 171.5+87% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Codename | GA107 | GA106 |
| Release | December 17 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #349 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












