
GeForce GTX Titan
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅33.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 483.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX Titan
2013GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
2022Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅33.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $750 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 483.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 8.2 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3050 OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌301.2% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX Titan?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX Titan still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 172 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 49 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 368 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 295 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 357 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 276 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 201 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 134 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 217 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 268 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 372 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 125 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX Titan and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX Titan
GeForce GTX Titan
The GeForce GTX Titan is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 19 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 837 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2688 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,181 points. Launch price was $999.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX Titan scores 8,181 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 45.4%. The GeForce GTX Titan is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,688 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 4.709 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,181 | 11,892+45% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2688+5% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.709 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1755 MHz+100% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 224+180% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.22 MB | 2.5 MB+1036% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX Titan is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX Titan comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 28.6% advantage for the GeForce GTX Titan. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s+29% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.0 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.3+30% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX Titan draws 250W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 63.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 130W-48% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7 | 91.5+180% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX Titan launched at $999 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 75.1% less ($750 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.2 (GeForce GTX Titan) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 482.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX Titan | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $249-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2 | 47.8+483% |
| Codename | GK110 | GA106 |
| Release | February 19 2013 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #311 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












