G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,799 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅+213% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

2022

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Why buy it

✅+213% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,799 vs 11,892).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 47.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $249 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3050 OEM better than GeForce GTX 680MX?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 11,892 vs 3,799 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a 2022 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 680MX is a 2012 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012, 213.0% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $249 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 213.0% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GeForce GTX 680MX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 680MX is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 680MX Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	78 FPS	130 FPS
medium	67 FPS	113 FPS
high	53 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	119 FPS
medium	60 FPS	96 FPS
high	43 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	69 FPS
4K
low	25 FPS	64 FPS
medium	24 FPS	57 FPS
high	16 FPS	39 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680MX Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	64 FPS	239 FPS
medium	42 FPS	206 FPS
high	31 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	21 FPS	128 FPS
1440p
low	37 FPS	163 FPS
medium	21 FPS	135 FPS
high	15 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	11 FPS	92 FPS
4K
low	13 FPS	88 FPS
medium	8 FPS	74 FPS
high	6 FPS	62 FPS
ultra	5 FPS	49 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680MX Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	171 FPS	535 FPS
medium	137 FPS	428 FPS
high	114 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	401 FPS
medium	103 FPS	321 FPS
high	85 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	201 FPS
4K
low	85 FPS	268 FPS
medium	68 FPS	214 FPS
high	57 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	134 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680MX Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
1080p
low	128 FPS	467 FPS
medium	103 FPS	414 FPS
high	88 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	268 FPS
1440p
low	97 FPS	372 FPS
medium	80 FPS	321 FPS
high	69 FPS	236 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	199 FPS
medium	44 FPS	175 FPS
high	35 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	125 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 680MX Open GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 213%. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
G3D Mark Score	3,799	11,892+213%
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1536	2560+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 680MX is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 40% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	160 GB/s	224 GB/s+40%
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Encoder	NVENC (Kepler)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC (Kepler)	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 6.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 680MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 235mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680MX	GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
TDP	122W-6%	130W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	8-pin
Length	0mm	235mm
Height	0mm	124mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	31.1	91.5+194%